Federal Budget Revamp, FY 2025-2026

Today, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne presented his first budget. Mark Carney was elected Prime Minister with a mandate to transform Canada’s economy and reduce its dependence on trade with the United States. The Carney government’s inaugural budget emphasizes structural changes to strengthen the domestic economy and boost non-U.S. exports, and it will be funded by an increase in government debt.

Carney, a former central banker who took office in March, has committed to decreasing reliance on the U.S. by increasing military spending, accelerating infrastructure projects, speeding up housing construction, and enhancing business competitiveness. Given the current large deficits and a rising debt-to-GDP ratio, the government cannot afford higher long-term interest rates. Carney has promised to build a stronger Canada using domestic resources and labour, noting that only 40% of the steel used in Canada is produced domestically, and he intends to change that.

Champagne has cautioned that the public service will need to shrink as the government strives to balance the budget in the coming years. Carney also faces a political challenge in convincing some opposition members to support his budget or at least abstain from voting against it. His Liberal Party caucus is currently three seats short of a majority in the House of Commons, meaning it cannot pass the budget on its own.

Unemployment remains high, economic growth is weak, and exporters, along with business investment, are still struggling due to U.S. tariffs. Carney and Champagne must persuade citizens that jobs, real wages, and living standards will eventually improve if they can stimulate both domestic and foreign investment.

Last week, the Bank of Canada indicated that it is nearing the limit of monetary stimulus it can provide without triggering inflation. Governor Tiff Macklem has consistently stated that he sees fiscal policy as a more effective tool to counter the adverse effects of the trade war, which he perceives as a negative supply shock.

The chart above indicates that Canada not only had the lowest deficit-to-GDP ratio in the G-7 but also among all countries with a triple-A credit rating. However, the rate at which we are issuing net new debt is expected to accelerate over the next year or two. Canada needs to assure the bond market that we will maintain our triple-A credit rating to keep financing costs manageable. Ottawa has divided the budget into two parts: the operating budget and the capital spending budget. The operating budget covers the costs of running the federal government, which includes salaries, wages, rent, and interest payments on the debt. Carney has urged government leaders to review their operating budgets and eliminate unnecessary costs, which include downsizing the federal workforce.

A similar approach is used in countries like the United Kingdom and New Zealand, as well as by some provinces here at home. In principle, this shift could enhance transparency by allowing a better understanding of how public funds are allocated between day‑to‑day program spending and long‑term investments intended to boost future growth. The capital spending budget is more complex because it’s harder to determine which expenditures will enhance growth and productivity. For instance, while the government is increasing defence spending to meet our NATO obligations, not all of it will contribute to productivity growth. Ottawa’s agenda highlights major infrastructure projects, defence initiatives, housing, significant undertakings like pipelines, enhanced ports, and the development of the Ring of Fire. Federal leadership believes there is a role for industrial policy, as well as measures aimed at broad deregulation and tax competitiveness.

This year’s federal budget projects a deficit of $78.3 billion—nearly double the Liberals’ projection a year ago—prioritizing capital project spending over services. The deficit is expected to decrease gradually to $56.6 billion by 2029-30. Only a year ago, the Liberals forecast a 2025 budget deficit of $42.2 billion, but that was before trade uncertainty and tariff inflation hit our shores with the inauguration of Donald Trump last January.

The budget presents both downside and upside scenarios. In the downside scenario, ongoing trade uncertainty could worsen the budgetary balance by $9.2 billion annually, while the upside scenario anticipates a $5 billion annual improvement contingent on easing trade uncertainties.

Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne emphasized the need for “generational” investments, allocating $25 billion to housing, $30 billion to defence, and $115 billion to infrastructure over the next five years. He criticized proposals to cap the deficit at $42 billion, advocating instead for investments to drive future growth.

The 2025 budget introduces a new format that separates capital and operational spending, with capital investments accounting for 58% of this year’s combined deficit. This shift aims to catalyze $500 billion in private-sector investment. However, we should be skeptical that such animal spirits will materialize quickly, given the immense uncertainty about the future of the Canada-Mexico-US free trade agreement.

The budget pledges to balance operational spending in three years.

Ottawa has been running a “comprehensive expenditure review” to spend less on the day-to-day operations of the federal government. According to the budget, that plan will save $13 billion annually by 2028-29, for a total of $60 billion in savings and revenues over five years.

The budget promises more taxpayer dollars will go toward “nation-building infrastructure, clean energy, innovation, productivity and less on day-to-day operating spending.” This “new discipline” will help protect social benefits, the budget promises.

The public service will see a drop of about 40,000 positions over the coming years. The budget projects it will have 330,000 employees in 2028-29, down from the 368,000 counted last year.

To confront an anemic economic picture, the government says it’s “supercharging growth” and vows to “make Canada’s investment environment more competitive than the U.S.”

To that end, the budget introduces a “productivity super-deduction” tax measure that will allow companies to write off a larger share of capital investments more quickly.

There are also new measures specifically for writing off expenses for manufacturing or processing buildings, as well as a new capital cost allowance for liquefied natural gas (LNG) equipment and related buildings.

Build Baby BuildFast-tracking nation-building projects: In close partnership with provinces, territories, Indigenous Peoples, and private investors, the government is streamlining regulatory approvals and helping to structure financing.

Additional Cuts to Immigration

Selling it as Ottawa “taking back control” over an immigration system that has put pressure on Canada’s housing supply and health-care system, budget 2025 promises to lower admission targets.

The new plan proposes to drastically reduce the target for new temporary resident admissions from 673,650 in 2025 to 385,000 in 2026.

The 2026-28 immigration levels plan would keep permanent resident admission targets at 380,000 per year, down from 395,000 in 2025.

Ending Some High-End Taxes

The government is also proposing to undertake a one-time measure to accelerate the transition of up to 33,000 work permit holders to permanent residency in 2026 and 2027.

“These workers have established strong roots in their communities, are paying taxes and are helping to build the strong economy Canada needs,” the budget notes.

To fill labour gaps, the Liberals’ plan includes a foreign credential recognition action fund to work with the provinces and territories to improve transparency, timeliness and consistency of foreign credential recognition.

It would also launch a strategy to attract international talent, including a one-time initiative to recruit over 1,000 highly qualified international researchers to Canada.

In addition, there were billions of dollars in increased defence spending, the details of which are still sketchy.

Bottom Line

Nothing in this budget is surprising, as most of it has been telegraphed in recent weeks. The budget asserts that “the global trade landscape is changing rapidly, as the United States reshapes its economic relationships and supply chains around the world. The impact is profound—hurting Canadian companies, displacing workers, disrupting supply chains, and creating uncertainty that holds back investment. This level of uncertainty is greater than what we have seen in recent crises. Budget 2025 makes generational investments while maintaining Canada’s strong fiscal advantage—a foundation that allows us to invest ambitiously and responsibly, and build Canada’s economy to be the strongest in the G-7.”

Canada has the lowest net debt-to-GDP ratio among the G-7 and one of the smallest deficit-to-GDP ratios. Canada and Germany are the only two G-7 economies rated triple-A, a marker of strong investor confidence which helps keep our borrowing costs as low as possible. This is a time for bold actions to bolster Canada’s competitiveness. We have products the world needs. Hopefully, we can salvage a significant part of the trade agreement with the US, but the odds suggest we build the infrastructure necessary to trade our products worldwide.

Canadian Inflation Stronger Than Expected

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 2.4% on a year-over-year basis in September, up from a 1.9% increase in August. The acceleration in headline inflation from 1.9% in August was also larger than the median projection in a Bloomberg survey of economists, which was 2.2%.

On a year-over-year basis, gasoline prices fell less in September (-4.1%) compared with August (-12.7%) due to a base-year effect, leading to an acceleration in headline inflation. Excluding gasoline, the CPI rose 2.6% in September, after increasing 2.4% in August.

A slower year-over-year decline in prices for travel tours (-1.3%) and a larger increase in prices for food purchased from stores (+4.0%) also contributed to the upward pressure in the all-items CPI in September.

The CPI rose 0.1% month over month in September. On a seasonally adjusted monthly basis, the CPI was up 0.4%.

Gasoline prices fell 4.1% year over year in September after a 12.7% decrease in August. The smaller year-over-year decline was primarily due to a base-year effect. In September 2024, prices fell 7.1% month over month due, in part, to lower crude oil prices amid growing concerns of weaker economic growth, particularly in China and the United States. In September 2025, gasoline prices rose 1.9% monthly following refinery disruptions and maintenance in the United States and Canada, which put upward pressure on prices.

On a year-over-year basis, prices for travel tours fell 1.3% in September following a 9.3% decline in August. Despite typically declining on a month-over-month basis in September, travel tour prices rose 4.6% in the month. This was a result of higher prices for destinations in Europe and some parts of the United States, as significant events in destination cities put upward pressure on hotel prices.

Consumers paid 4.0% more year over year for food purchased from stores in September, following a 3.5% increase in August. Faster price growth was driven by increased prices for fresh vegetables (+1.9% in September, compared with -2.0% in August) and sugar and confectionery (+9.2% in September, compared with +5.8% in August).

Year-over-year grocery price inflation has generally trended upward since its most recent low in April 2024 (+1.4%). Grocery items contributing to the general acceleration included fresh or frozen beef and coffee, both due, in part, to lower supply.

Tuition fees, priced annually in September, increased 1.7% in 2025 compared with a 1.8% increase in 2024. Aside from 2019, the 2025 increase was the smallest since 1976, when the index was unchanged (0.0%).

In 2025, students from Prince Edward Island (+4.7%) experienced the largest price increase. At the same time, students from Nova Scotia (+1.1%) and Ontario (+1.1%) had the smallest increase, coinciding with a freeze on tuition fees in both provinces.

Bank of Canada Deputy Governor Rhys Mendes recently warned that traders may be putting too much emphasis on its two “preferred” core inflation measures, the so-called trim and median gauges.

In September, both CPI-median and CPI-trim came in hotter than economists were expecting. The average of these metrics was 3.15% in September, while the three-month moving average accelerated to 2.7%.

Mendes said the central bank is weighing a broader suite of gauges that suggest underlying price pressures are closer to its 2% target.

Shelter inflation rose 2.6% on an annual basis, while CPI excluding food and energy was 2.4%. CPI excluding eight volatile components and indirect taxes was 2.8%, up from 2.6%.

CPI excluding taxes accelerated to 2.9% from 2.4% the previous month.

The share of components within the consumer price index basket that are rising 3% and higher — another key metric that policymakers are watching closely — declined slightly to 38%.

All 10 Canadian provinces saw prices rising at a faster year-over-year pace in September compared with August. Quebec experienced the steepest price growth, reaching 3.3% last month.

Rent prices also accelerated nationally to 4.8%, led by a 9.8% increase in Quebec. Slower rent price growth of 1.8% in British Columbia moderated the national increase, the report noted.

Bottom Line

The report shows that underlying price pressures remain elevated, raising questions about how quickly the central bank can proceed with rate cuts to aid the tariff-hit economy.

Still, the acceleration in headline and most core measures was driven by a gasoline price base-year effect — a possible reason for analysts to look through the print.

Traders in overnight swaps pared bets on a rate cut next week, lowering the odds to about 65% from close to 80% before the report. The loonie jumped to the day’s high against the US dollar. Canadian debt fell across the curve, with the two-year yield rising about three basis points to a session high at 2.38%.

The ongoing trade war with the US drove the Bank of Canada to lower its policy rate by a quarter of a percentage point to 2.5% in September, marking the first cut in six months.

During their deliberations last month, some members of its governing council argued that more support would likely be needed given the softness in the economy, notably if the labour market weakened further.

Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem recently described Canada’s labour market as “soft,” despite data showing the country added 60,400 jobs in September, which only partially reversed a decline of more than 100,000 positions over the previous two months.

Canadian Home Sales Post Best September In Four Years
Today’s release of the September housing data by the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) showed a pullback on the housing front. The number of home sales recorded through Canadian MLS® Systems declined by 1.7% on a month-over-month basis in September 2025. Nevertheless, it was the best month of September for sales since 2021

The slight monthly decline was the result of lower sales activity in Greater Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Ottawa, and Montreal, which more than offset gains in the Greater Toronto Area and Winnipeg.

“While the trend of rising sales that began earlier this year took a breather in September, activity was still running at the highest level for that month since 2021, and that was true in July and August as well, said Shaun Cathcart, CREA’s Senior Economist. “With three years of pent-up demand still out there and more normal interest rates finally here, the forecast continues to be for further upward momentum in home sales over the final quarter of the year and into 2026.”

New Listings

New supply dropped 0.8% month-over-month in September. Combined with a slightly larger decline in sales activity, the sales-to-new listings ratio eased slightly to 50.7% compared to 51.2% in August. The long-term average for the national sales-to-new listings ratio is 54.9%, with readings roughly between 45% and 65% generally consistent with balanced housing market conditions.

There were 199,772 properties listed for sale on all Canadian MLS® Systems at the end of September 2025, up 7.5% from a year earlier but very close to the long-term average for that time of the year.

“While there are more buyers in the market now than at almost any other point in the last four years, sales activity is still below average and well below where the long-term trend suggests it should be,” said Valérie Paquin, CREA Chair. “As such, we expect things to continue to pick up steadily in the future.

There were 4.4 months of inventory on a national basis at the end of September 2025, unchanged from July and August and the lowest level since January. The long-term average for this measure of market balance is five months of inventory. Based on one standard deviation above and below that long-term average, a seller’s market would be below 3.6 months, and a buyer’s market would be above 6.4 months.

Home Prices

The National Composite MLS® Home Price Index (HPI) was again almost unchanged (-0.1%) between August and September 2025. Following declines in the first quarter of the year, the national benchmark price has remained mostly stable since April.

The non-seasonally adjusted National Composite MLS® HPI was down 3.4% compared to September 2024. Based on the extent to which prices fell off beginning in the fall of 2024, look for year-over-year declines to shrink in the fourth quarter of the year.

Bottom Line

Homebuyers are responding to improving fundamentals in the Canadian housing market. Supply has risen as new listings surged until May of this year. Additionally, the national benchmark average price is 3.5% lower than it was a year earlier. That decrease was smaller than in August.

The view is nearly unanimous that the Federal Reserve will cut the overnight policy rate again by 25 basis points when it meets again on October 29.

The jury is out on the Bank of Canada’s next move. Their decision date is also October 29. While the stronger-than-expected labour market report might have dissuaded the Bank from easing, all eyes will be on the next CPI report on October 21.

With the Bank of Canada cutting the policy rate halfway through September and another 25-basis-point reduction expected by January, if not sooner, the CREA forecasts sales to rise by 7.7% in 2026.

“Interest rates were always going to be the thing that brought this thing back to life,” Cathcart said in an interview. “While that long-anticipated recovery has been delayed and dampened by trade uncertainty, the Bank of Canada is getting close to dipping out of the neutral range and into stimulative territory.

Canadian Employment Rises More Than Expected, But Not Enough To Fully Offset Prior Two-Month Job Loss

Today’s Labour Force Survey for September was stronger than expected, with a net employment gain of 60,400, but the unemployment rate was steady at 7.1% as more people entered the workforce. The employment gain was driven by full-time work. The manufacturing sector–hard hit by US tariffs–added 27,800 employees, and agriculture, health care and other services all added workers. The employment rate — the proportion of the working-age population that’s employed — rose 0.1 percentage points to 60.6% in September.

Average hourly wages among employees increased 3.3% (+$1.17 to $36.78) on a year-over-year basis in September, following growth of 3.2% in August (not seasonally adjusted).

The surprisingly strong job gains suggest Canada’s job market is showing some resilience to tariff disputes with the US. The jump in factory employment, although not driven by autos, suggests the sector may benefit from some exporters’ exemption from levies under the Canada-US-Mexico trade Agreement.

The loonie surged in response to the news as shorter-term interest rates rose. The report reduces expectations for a rate cut when the Bank of Canada meets again on October 29, with traders putting the odds at about 25%, down from 70% before the data release. However, the better-than-expected job gains did not fully offset the losses posted in July and August, as Canada shed a net 45,900 jobs over the third quarter, the weakest quarter since the pandemic.

Total hours worked fell 0.2% last month, and the labour force rose by 72,300.

Even with the latest jobs report, the Canadian economy remains vulnerable to the unsettling US attitude towards the free trade agreement, which is slated to be renegotiated by July 2026. The Bank of Canada cut the overnight policy rate to 2.5% in September, and additional rate cuts are likely this year. The Bank has only two more decision dates in 2025: October 29 and December 10. September inflation data will be released on October 21, the day after the BoC publication of the Business and Consumer Outlook Survey.

The overall unemployment rate was unchanged at 7.1% in September, following a 0.2 percentage point increase in August. Since the start of 2025, the unemployment rate has increased by 0.5 percentage points. The trend has generally been upward since the beginning of the year, with an increase of 0.6 percentage points compared to January. Youth unemployment rates remain elevated, with the jobless rate among students at a whopping 17.1%, and at 11.9% for youth not attending school.

Employment in manufacturing rose in September (+28,000; +1.5%), the first increase since January. The gain was concentrated in Ontario (+12,000) and Alberta (+7,900). Before the rise in September, employment in manufacturing had recorded a net decline of 58,000 (-3.1%) from January to August.

Employment change by industry, September 2025

In Quebec, employment was little changed for a third consecutive month in September. The unemployment rate in Quebec in September (5.7%) was down from the recent peak of 6.3% recorded in June, and little changed on a year-over-year basis. However, Quebec will undoubtedly see job losses in the aluminum and lumber industries unless US tariffs are reduced sharply.

Employment was also little changed in Ontario in September. The unemployment rate in the province increased by 0.2 percentage points to 7.9% in September, as more people searched for work. The unemployment rate in the province was up 0.8 percentage points from September 2024. In the CMA of Toronto, the unemployment rate was unchanged at 8.9% in September 2025 and was up 0.8 percentage points on a year-over-year basis (three-month moving averages).

Bottom Line

The Bank of Canada has made it clear that it will focus on inflation as well as on increasing slack in the economy, and a September cut may still hinge on the consumer price index released next week. Labour markets are still softer than they were a year ago. The unemployment rate held steady at 7.1% in September, but it remains up half a percent from a year ago. International trade data softened in August, and U.S. tariffs remain a significant threat to the economic outlook.

It is doubtful that Bank of Canada policymakers thought in September that just one cut in the overnight rate would be enough to address economic weakness, and the labour force data today probably isn’t positive enough alone to derail another cut in October. Still, the Bank of Canada will also have to take into account the next round of inflation data – and future cuts beyond October would be less likely if government deficit spending ramps up as expected to help address tariff-related economic weakness.

The central bank is well aware that the Labour Force Survey is notoriously volatile, and the jobless rate at 7.1% is still up half a percentage point from a year ago. The underlying details of the report were not as positive. Actual hours worked declined despite the surge in full-time employment. And permanent layoffs ticked higher. But other sectors have remained broadly resilient. Services employment was up 18k month-over-month and 225k year-over-year last month.

If you are reading this you probably have a keen interest in improving your financial situation — but how are you going to measure your progress?

The easiest way is by setting and achieving a goal. This could be short-term and focused, like wiping out a credit card debt. On the other hand, it could be a long-term goal like burning the mortgage five years ahead of time after twenty years of scrimping and saving.

Achieving either of these goals is a great accomplishment, but they may not tell the whole story. The problem with both of them is they are independent from all of the other factors that affect your financial standing. What if the value of the house you just paid off has dropped 20% over the last year, or you eliminated one credit card balance only to see another card or line of credit head in the opposite direction?

No single metric tells the whole story of your financial progress. Paying yourself first and diligently putting $300 from every paycheque into your RRSP will definitely help you hit your retirement goals. However, you also need to monitor the growth from investing your RRSP as well as any other assets that are contributing to your retirement fund and ensure the total value is steadily tracking towards your goal.

Cash flow is another common measure of financial progress. Tracking your income and expenses helps you understand how much money you have available after covering your costs. Positive cash flow is a surplus that can be used for saving, investing, or paying down debt — but it doesn’t measure how effective you were at putting that cash surplus to work. You may think you are making progress, but if you let the cash sit in a bank savings account instead of a GIC in your TFSA, then you actually made comparatively poor progress.

If you want to keep it simple and look at only one metric to get a holistic view of your financial health, measuring your net worth can provide you with valuable insights. It’s an easy-to-understand concept that will help you analyze your financial health and overall progress towards your financial goals.

Calculating your net worth isn’t all that difficult and although it represents only a snapshot in time, the main advantage is that it provides a comprehensive snapshot. It takes into account all of your assets (such as cash, investments, real estate, and valuable possessions) and subtracts your liabilities (such as debts and loans). Monitoring your net worth forces you to be aware of all your financial accounts and can help you make more informed decisions about your spending, saving, and investing habits.

As you work to increase your assets and reduce your liabilities, your net worth should show positive growth. This signifies that you’re making smart financial decisions and accumulating wealth over time. Seeing your net worth increase can be motivating and reinforce positive financial behaviors. On the flip side, if you notice a decline, it can signal that you need to reevaluate your financial decisions and make necessary adjustments.

Monitoring your net worth helps you understand how effectively you’re building wealth. Although the market value of assets such as stocks or real estate fluctuate, comparing your net worth to previous periods can still help you evaluate the effectiveness of different financial strategies you’ve implemented. This allows you to refine your approach and make changes as needed.

Your net worth is an essential factor in assessing your retirement readiness. It helps you determine if you’re on track to maintain your desired lifestyle during retirement and whether you need to adjust your savings and investment strategies. It can also influence your estate planning decisions. It’s important for determining how you want your assets distributed after your passing and for considering strategies to minimize potential estate taxes.

There are lots of ways to measure financial growth and no one method is perfect, but keeping an eye on your net worth is a relatively easy task that will do wonders for your motivation — why not give it a try?

Today’s Labour Force Survey for August was weaker than expected, indicating an excess supply in the labour market and the economy. Employment fell by 66,000 (-0.3%) in August, extending the decline recorded in July (-41,000; -0.2%). The employment decrease in August was mainly due to a decline in part-time work (-60,000; -1.5%). Full-time employment was little changed in August, following a decrease in July (-51,000; -0.3%).

The employment rate—the proportion of the working-age population who are employed—fell 0.2 percentage points to 60.5% in August, the second consecutive monthly decline. The employment rate has been on a downward trend since the beginning of the year, falling 0.6 percentage points from January to August.

The number of self-employed workers fell by 43,000 (-1.6%) in August. Self-employment has trended down in recent months, offsetting gains recorded in the second half of 2024 and in early 2025.

The private sector lost 7,500 jobs last month, while the public sector shed 15,000. Regionally, the provinces of Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia led losses.

Those who were unemployed in July continued to face difficulties finding work in August. Just 15.2% of those who were unemployed in July had found work in August, lower than the corresponding proportion for the same months from 2017 to 2019 (23.3%) (not seasonally adjusted).

The participation rate—the proportion of the population aged 15 and older who were employed or looking for work—fell by 0.1 percentage points to 65.1% in August.

From May to August, the Labour Force Survey (LFS) collects labour market information from students who attended school full-time in March and who intend to return to school full-time in the fall.

The unemployment rate for returning students stood at 16.9% in August, similar to the rate observed 12 months earlier (16.3%) (not seasonally adjusted).
For the summer of 2025 overall (the average from May to August), the unemployment rate for returning students aged 15 to 24 was 17.9%. This was the highest since the summer of 2009 (18.0%), excluding the pandemic year of 2020. The unemployment rate for returning students has increased each summer since 2022 (when it was 10.4%).

The unemployment rate among returning students in the summer of 2025 was higher for men (19.2%) than for women (16.8%).

Employment decreased in the professional, scientific, and technical services sector in August (-26,000; -1.3%), following five months of little change. Despite the monthly decline, employment in the industry was up 36,000 (+1.8%) compared with 12 months earlier.

Employment in transportation and warehousing fell by 23,000 (-2.1%) in August, offsetting a similar-sized increase in July. On a year-over-year basis, employment in the industry was little changed in August.

Employment change by industry in August 2025

Fewer people were working in manufacturing in August, down 19,000 (-1.0%). Compared with the recent peak of January 2025, employment in manufacturing has declined by 58,000 (-3.1%).

On the other hand, employment rose in construction (+17,000; +1.1%) in August, offsetting most of the decline in July (-22,000; -1.3%). Employment in construction has recorded little net variation since the beginning of the year, and the increase in August was the first since January.

Employment in Ontario decreased by 26,000 (-0.3%) in August. Compared to the recent peak in February 2025, employment in the province decreased by 66,000 (-0.8%) in August. The unemployment rate in Ontario declined by 0.2 percentage points to 7.7% in August, as the number of people searching for work decreased.

Since the beginning of the year, regions of Southern Ontario have faced an uncertain economic climate, brought on by the threat or imposition of tariffs, including on motor vehicle and parts exports. Across Canada’s 20 largest census metropolitan areas, the highest unemployment rates in August were in Windsor (11.1% compared with 9.1% in January), Oshawa (9.0% compared with 8.2% in January) and Toronto (8.9% compared with 8.8% in January) (three-month moving averages).

In British Columbia, employment decreased by 16,000 (-0.5%) in August, marking the second consecutive monthly decline. Losses in the month were mainly among core-aged men (-13,000; -1.2%). The unemployment rate in British Columbia rose 0.3 percentage points to 6.2%.

In Alberta, employment fell by 14,000 (-0.6%) in August, also the second consecutive monthly decrease. The most significant declines in the month were in manufacturing and in wholesale and retail trade. The unemployment rate in Alberta rose 0.6 percentage points to 8.4% in August, the highest rate since August 2017 (excluding 2020 and 2021).

Unemployment rate by province and territory, August 2025

Unemployment rates highest in southern Ontario census metropolitan areas

Employment also declined in New Brunswick (-6,500; -1.6%), Manitoba (-5,200; -0.7%), and Newfoundland and Labrador (-3,200; -1.3%) in August. Meanwhile, Prince Edward Island experienced an employment gain of 1,100 (+1.2%).

Employment held steady for a second consecutive month in Quebec in August. The number of people looking for work increased by 24,000 (+9.0%), pushing the unemployment rate up 0.5 percentage points to 6.0%.

Total hours worked were little changed in August (+0.1%) and were up 0.9% compared with 12 months earlier.

Average hourly wages among employees increased 3.2% (+$1.12 to $36.31) on a year-over-year basis in August, following growth of 3.3% in July (not seasonally adjusted).

Bottom Line

The two-year government of Canada bond yield fell about four bps on the news, while the loonie weakened. Traders in overnight swaps fully priced in a quarter-point rate cut by the Bank of Canada by year-end, and boosted the odds of a September cut to about 85%.

The Bank of Canada has made it clear that it will focus on inflation more than on increasing slack in the economy, and a September cut may still hinge on the consumer price index release, which is due a day before the rate decision.

The August US nonfarm payrolls report was also released this morning, showing that job growth stalled while the unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.3%. Several sectors, including information, financial activities, manufacturing, federal government and business services, posted outright declines in August. Job growth was concentrated in the healthcare and leisure and hospitality sectors.

Markets expect the Fed to cut rates by 25 basis points on September 17. Fed Chair Jay Powell has been under massive pressure from the White House to do so. Barring a meaningful rise in August core inflation measures, the Fed will resume cutting rates.

Statistics Canada released Q2 GDP data, showing a weaker-than-expected -1.6% seasonally adjusted annual rate, in line with the Bank of Canada’s forecast, but a larger dip than the consensus forecast. The contraction primarily reflected a sharp decline in exports, down 26.8%, which reduced headline GDP growth by 8.1 percentage points. Business fixed investment was also weak, contracting 10.1%, mainly due to a 32.6% decline in business equipment spending.

Exports declined 7.5% in the second quarter after increasing 1.4% in the first quarter. As a consequence of United States-imposed tariffs, international exports of passenger cars and light trucks plummeted 24.7% in the second quarter. Exports of industrial machinery, equipment and parts (-18.5%) and travel services (-11.1%) also declined.

Amid the counter-tariff response by the Canadian government to imports from the United States (which has now been rescinded), international imports declined 1.3% in the second quarter, following a 0.9% increase in the previous quarter. Lower imports of passenger vehicles (-9.2%) and travel services (-8.5%; primarily Canadians travelling abroad) were offset by higher imports of intermediate metal products (+35.8%), particularly unwrought gold, silver, and platinum group metals.

Export (-3.3%) and import (-2.3%) prices fell in the second quarter, as businesses likely absorbed some of the additional costs of tariffs by lowering prices. Given the larger decline in export prices, the terms of trade—the ratio of the price of exports to the price of imports—fell 1.1%.

But the report was not all bad news. Consumer resilience was also evident. Household consumption spending accelerated in Q2. Personal spending rose 4.5% compared to 0.5% in Q1. Government spending also notably contributed to growth.

An improvement in housing activity also added to economic activity. Residential investment grew at a firm rate of 6.3%, compared to a decline of 12.2% in the first quarter of the year.

Final domestic demand rose 3.5% annualized, reflecting resilience and perhaps Canadians’ boycott of US travel or US products. However, income growth was up just 0.7% year-over-year (at an annual rate), which pulled the savings rate down one percentage point to 5.0%, potentially hampering consumers’ ability to continue their spending.

Inventories of finished goods and inputs to the production process increased by 26.9%, reflecting the Q1 stockpiling of goods that would be subject to future tariffs.

While Q2 was soft, June GDP was arguably more disappointing at -0.1% m/m, two ticks below consensus. Manufacturing was the surprise, falling 1.5%. Services were mixed, with gains in wholesale and retail offsetting some broader weakness. The July flash estimate was +0.1% (on the firmer side, given some of the soft data thus far), but the June figure makes it clear that the final print can be quite different.

The Bank had Q2 GDP at -1.5% in their July Monetary Policy Report, so the miss was minor. And, the strength in domestic demand highlights the economy’s resilience. One negative is that Q3 is tracking softer than their +1% estimate (closer to +0.5%), but it’s still very early, and things can change materially.

Bottom Line

The odds are no better than even for the Bank of Canada to cut rates when they meet again on September 17. There are two key data releases before then — the August Labour Force Survey, released August 5, a week from today, and the August CPI release on September 16. We would have to see considerable weakness in both reports to trigger a Canadian rate cut next month.

A Fed rate cut is far more likely, as telegraphed by Chair Jay Powell at the annual Jackson Hole confab. The battle between the White House and the Fed has intensified with President Trump’s firing of Governor Lisa Cook, the first Black woman on the Board and a Biden appointee. If Trump were to succeed, it would enable him to appoint a majority of the Federal Reserve Board, potentially allowing him to dictate monetary policy.

Trump wants significantly lower interest rates in the US, but even if he succeeds, only shorter-term rates would decline. The loss of Fed independence could lead to higher, longer-term interest rates, which could likely result in higher fixed mortgage rates in Canada. Moreover, inflation pressures could intensify, leading to continued upward pressure on bond yields and diminishing the potential appeal of floating-rate mortgage loans.

Today’s CPI Report Shows Headline Inflation Cooling, But Core Inflation Remains Troubling
Canadian consumer prices decelerated to 1.7% y/y in July, a bit better than expected and down two ticks from June’s reading.

Gasoline prices led the slowdown in the all-items CPI, falling 16.1% year over year in July, following a 13.4% decline in June. Excluding gasoline, the CPI rose 2.5% in July, matching the increases in May and June.

Gasoline prices fell 0.7% m/m in July. Lower crude oil prices, following the ceasefire between Iran and Israel, contributed to the decline. In addition, increased supply from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its partners (OPEC+) put downward pressure on the index.

Moderating the deceleration in July were higher prices for groceries and a smaller year-over-year decline in natural gas prices compared with June.

The CPI rose 0.3% month over month in July. On a seasonally adjusted monthly basis, the CPI was up 0.1%.

In July, prices for shelter rose 3.0% year over year, following a 2.9% increase in June, with upward pressure mostly coming from the natural gas and rent indexes. This was the first acceleration in shelter prices since February 2024.

Prices for natural gas fell to a lesser extent in July (-7.3%) compared with June (-14.1%). The smaller decline was mainly due to higher prices in Ontario, which increased 1.8% in July after a 14.0% decline in June.

Rent prices rose at a faster pace year over year, up 5.1% in July following a 4.7% increase in June. Rent price growth accelerated the most in Prince Edward Island (+5.6%), Newfoundland and Labrador (+7.8%) and British Columbia (+4.8%). Moderating the acceleration in shelter was continued slower price growth in mortgage interest cost, which rose 4.8% year over year in July, after a 5.6% gain in June. The mortgage interest cost index has decelerated on a year-over-year basis since September 2023.

The Bank of Canada’s two preferred core inflation measures accelerated slightly, averaging 3.05%, up from 3% in May, and above economists’ median projection. Traders see the continued strength in core inflation as indicative of relatively robust household spending. There’s also another critical sign of firmer price pressures: The share of components in the consumer price index basket that are rising by 3% or more — another key metric the central bank’s policymakers are watching closely — expanded to 40%, from 39.1% in June.

CPI excluding taxes eased to 2.3%, while CPI excluding shelter slowed to 1.2%. CPI excluding food and energy dropped to 2.5%, and CPI excluding eight volatile components and indirect taxes fell to 2.6%.

The breadth of inflation is also rising. The share of components with the consumer price index basket that are increasing 3% and higher — another key metric that the bank’s policymakers are following closely — fell to 37.3%, from 39.1% in June.

Bottom Line

With today’s CPI painting a mixed picture, the following inflation report becomes more critical for the Governing Council. The August CPI will be released the day before the September 17 meeting of the central bank. There is also another employment report released on September 5.

Traders see roughly 84% odds of a Federal Reserve rate cut when they meet again on Sept 17–the same day as Canada. Currently, the odds of a rate cut by the BoC stand at 34%. Unless the August inflation report shows an improvement in core inflation, the Bank will remain on the sidelines.

Global Tariff Uncertainty Sidelines Buyers
Canadian existing home sales were unchanged last month as tariff concerns again mothballed home-buying intentions, mainly in the GTA and GVA where sales have declined for months. Consumer confidence has fallen to rock-bottom levels as many fear the prospect of job losses and higher prices.

The number of sales recorded over Canadian MLS® Systems was unchanged (-0.1%) between March and April 2025, marking a pause in the trend of declining activity since the beginning of the year. (Chart A) Demand is currently hovering around levels seen during the second half of 2022, and the first and third quarters of 2023.

“At this point, the 2025 Canadian housing story would best be described as a return to the quiet markets we’ve experienced since 2022, with tariff uncertainty taking the place of high interest rates in keeping buyers on the sidelines,” said Shaun Cathcart, CREA’s Senior Economist. “Given the increasing potential for a rough economic patch ahead, the risk going forward will be if an average number of people trying to sell their homes turns into a large number of people who have to sell their homes, and that’s something we have not seen in decades.”

New Listings

New supply declined by 1% month-over-month in April. Combined with flat sales, the national sales-to-new listings ratio climbed to 46.8% compared to 46.4% in March. The long-term average for the national sales-to-new listings ratio is 54.9%, with readings between 45% and 65% generally consistent with balanced housing market conditions.

At the end of April 2025, 183,000 properties were listed for sale on all Canadian MLS® Systems, up 14.3% from a year earlier but still below the long-term average of around 201,000 listings for that time of the year.

“The number of homes for sale across Canada has almost returned to normal, but that is the result of higher inventories in B.C. and Ontario, and tight inventories everywhere else,” said Valérie Paquin, CREA Chair.

There were 5.1 months of inventory on a national basis at the end of April 2025, which is in line with the long-term average of five months. Based on one standard deviation above and below that long-term average, a seller’s market would be below 3.6 months and a buyer’s market above 6.4 months.

Home Prices

The National Composite MLS® Home Price Index (HPI) declined 1.2% from March to April 2025. The non-seasonally adjusted National Composite MLS® HPI was down 3.6% compared to March 2024.

The National Composite MLS® Home Price Index (HPI) declined 1.2% from March to April 2025. The non-seasonally adjusted National Composite MLS® HPI was down 3.6% compared to March 2024.

Bottom Line

Before the tariff threats emerged, the housing market was poised for a strong rebound as the spring selling season approached.

Unfortunately, the situation has only deteriorated as business and consumer confidence have fallen sharply. While the first-round effect of tariffs is higher prices as importers attempt to pass off the higher costs to consumers, second-round effects slow economic activity, reflecting layoffs and business and household belt-tightening.

The Bank of Canada refrained from cutting the overnight policy rate for fear of tariff-related price hikes. Since then, Canadian labour markets have softened, and preliminary evidence suggests that economic activity will weaken further in recent months, despite a rollback in tariffs with China, at least temporarily.

While homebuyers are leery, real housing bargains are increasingly prevalent as supplies rise and home prices fall. Sellers are increasingly motivated to make deals, and pent-up demand is growing. Outside of the GTA and GVA, sales have remained positive.

We expect the Bank of Canada to cut the overnight rate again on June 4 as long as next week’s April inflation data are reasonably well behaved, which should be the case given the sharp fall in energy prices.

Managing debt is challenging at any age, but it can be especially stressful in retirement when income is limited. Many Canadians turn to debt consolidation to simplify payments and lower interest rates. However, traditional options—such as personal loans, refinancing, or home equity lines of credit—often require a strong credit score and steady income, making them difficult for retirees to secure.

The CHIP Reverse Mortgage: A Smart Debt Consolidation Solution
For homeowners aged 55 and older, the CHIP Reverse Mortgage from HomeEquity Bank offers a unique way to consolidate debt without required monthly payments. By tapping into home equity, retirees can pay off high-interest debt and enjoy greater financial freedom. Many CHIP customers have found relief through this solution.

Why Consider the CHIP Reverse Mortgage?
The CHIP Reverse Mortgage offers several key benefits for retirees looking to consolidate debt:

No monthly payments required: Unlike other loans, repayment is only required when you sell, move, or pass away.
Simple qualification: As long as you and your spouse are at least 55 years of age or older, the rest of the approval process is based on home equity rather than credit score or income.
Tax-free cash: Access up to 55% of your home’s value without affecting retirement benefits like OAS or GIS.
Flexibility: Receive funds as a lump sum or in installments, depending on your needs.
Protection against market fluctuations: HomeEquity Bank’s No Negative Equity Guarantee*ensures you or your heirs never owe more than the home’s fair market value, upon the due date of the loan.
Common Debt Consolidation Options vs. The CHIP Reverse Mortgage
You may explore various debt consolidation strategies during retirement, but they can come with challenges:

Refinancing or HELOC: Requires strong credit and income; missed payments can lead to foreclosure.
Unsecured personal loans: Often come with high interest rates if credit is poor.
RRSP withdrawals: Can trigger withholding taxes and impact retirement income.
Balance transfer credit cards: Signing up for a structured debt consolidation loan through a 0% balance-transfer card may require proof of income to cover your monthly minimum payments.
Take Control of Your Retirement Finances

Debt doesn’t have to define your retirement. With the CHIP Reverse Mortgage, you can consolidate debt, eliminate monthly payments, and enjoy financial stability while staying in your home. If you’re looking for a way to manage retirement debt, this may be the perfect solution.

To learn more about how the CHIP Reverse Mortgage can help you consolidate debt, contact me today!